Rabbi Barry Leff's Blog

  • Rabbi Barry Leff's Divrei Torah (sermons) and thoughts on other topics are posted here. Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel said the job of the rabbi is to "comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable." May you find whichever of those it is you need in these words!

Newsvine Israel News

Jerusalem Weather

People with Pages

  • Professor Howard Friedman
    Thought provoking stuff on law and society.
  • Rabbi Alana Suskin
    Rabbi Suskin was my main my chavruta (study partner) through rabbinical school. Her writings reflect her dedication to feminism and human rights. And her sense of humor.
  • Rabbi Brad Artson
    Dean of my alma mater, the Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies
  • Rabbi Dan Shevitz
    Be sure to check out the ways in which leading a synagogue is like flying an airplane...
  • Rabbi Jason Miller
    Rabbi Jason's blog is always interesting and timely...
  • Rabbi Mark Ankcorn
    I wasn't the first of my classmates (Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies, '02) with a blog. Rabbi Ankcorn can be counted on for an interesting perspective...

Jewish Bloggers Webring

Blog powered by TypePad

Technorati

March 14, 2008

Redeeming Captives

Today I had the rare opportunity to perform a mitzvah I have not done before:  redeeming captives.

This is an incredibly important mitzvah.  In the Mishneh Torah (Hilchot Matnot Aniyim) Rambam says:

"The redeeming of captives takes precedence over the feeding and clothing of the poor. Indeed there is no religious duty more meritorious than the redeeming of captives, for not only is the captive included in the generality of the hungry, the thirsty, and the naked, but his very life is in jeopardy. He who turns his eyes away from redeeming him, transgresses the commandments: You shalt not harden your heart, nor shut your hand (Deut. 15:7), Neither shall you stand idly by the blood of your neighbor (Lev. 19:16), and He shall not rule with rigor over him in your sight (Lev. 25:53). Moreover, he nullifies the commandments: You shall surely open your hand unto him (Deut. 15:8), That your brother may live with you (Lev. 25:36), You shall love your neighbor as yourself (Lev. 19:18), Deliver them that are drawn unto death (Prov. 24:11), and many similar admonitions. To sum up, there is no religious duty greater (Mitzvah Rabba) than the redeeming of captives."

However, when contemplating performing this great mitzvah, it never occurred to me that I would fulfill it by redeeming a rabbi from the hands of my government.  Yet that is how it worked out.

Continue reading "Redeeming Captives" »

January 18, 2008

Is Snitching a Jewish Value??

Spinka To read Rabbi Leff’s teshuva (Jewish legal opinion) on “Whistleblowing: The Requirement to Report Employer Wrongdoing” click here.

Amy Klein wrote a fascinating article in LA’s Jewish Journal about a financial scandal involving money laundering and tax fraud on the part of a Chasidic yeshiva in New York (Spinka), with help of colleagues in LA. You can read the article by clicking here.

How, you might be wondering, could a yeshiva get involved in such an activity?

The truth is, it is a lot easier than you might think for a non-profit organization to become involved in fraud and tax evasion. Here's how it works.  A wealthy individual wants to reduce his taxes.  So he gives the yeshiva a $1 million donation – on condition that they return something like $900,000 in cash to him. Mr. Big Bucks gets a million-dollar tax writeoff – easily worth something like $300,000 in real money – and the yeshiva gets to keep $100,000 for their efforts. For most yeshivas, a $100,000 donation is pretty significant.  They did this over and over; authorities identified over $8 million in fraudulent transations in one year alone.

But it’s against the law. How can kippah-wearing criminals justify such behavior?

Continue reading "Is Snitching a Jewish Value??" »

January 11, 2008

Bo 5768 -- Don't be Pharoah...

Pharaoh First of all, you can check out my latest posting on the "Persistence of Vision: Israel at Sixty" blog here .   I comment about my thoughts relating to President George Bush's visit to Jerusalem.

I really truly love Israel and love living here.  So I find it somewhat frustrating that when I look at a parsha, what comes up for me are issues that are critical of Israel, not necessarily supportive.  But I'm not going to duck it, when what comes up for me isn't pretty, I'm still going to share it.

Continue reading "Bo 5768 -- Don't be Pharoah..." »

October 17, 2007

"...a land of olive oil, and honey"

Image_204"Fifteen years ago," Saeed told me, "this month--the month of the olive harvest -- was the most fun time of the year."  The whole extended family would come out to the fields, they would bring elaborate meals, it used to be a big party.  Now -- because of the security situation -- it's not so much fun.

Nowadays -- because of settlers who harass, threaten, and in some cases harm Palestinian farmers tending their fields -- there is a need for Jewish volunteers to protect Palestinians from Jewish settlers.  Click here to read a story about the situation from NPR.

Yesterday I was one of those volunteers.  I was part of a group organized by Rabbis for Human Rights (RHR) that made a trip to the heart of the West Bank, to Shomron (Samaria) to participate in the olive harvest. 

The situation today is better than it used to be.  Thanks in part to law suits brought by RHR, the police and the army are regularly deploying to 'hot spots' to protect the farmers.  But there are still problems.  That's where the volunteers come in.

Continue reading ""...a land of olive oil, and honey"" »

October 12, 2007

Noah 5768

NoahRabbi Leff wrote this D'var Torah for, and it was first published by Rabbis for Human Rights - Israel  .

“Noah was a righteous and just man in his generation, God walked with Noah.”  …Genesis 6:9

There is a very famous Rashi on the opening verse in this week’s Torah portion.  The Torah tells us that Noah was a righteous and just man “b’dorotav,” in his generation.  Rashi focuses on “in his generation,” and explains there are those who read the phrase to Noah’s credit, and those who read it to Noah’s disgrace.  On the one hand, “if Noah could be righteous in such a terrible time, just think of how much more righteous he would have been if he lived in better times.”  On the other side, “Noah is only righteous because everyone in his day was a terrible sinner.  Compared to Abraham, Noah’s not so righteous.”

Those who would say Noah wasn’t so special can point to a midrash in Bereshit Rabbah (32:6) which says “Noah lacked faith; had the water not reached his ankles, he would not have entered the ark.” 

Noah had confidence in himself and in his abilities.  God told him to build an enormous ark, and he goes out and figures out how to get the job done. But he was a little lacking in his faith in God.  He needed a push to get into the ark.  He didn’t believe God meant what She said.

Continue reading "Noah 5768" »

May 12, 2007

Torah, Avodah, Gemilut Chesed

 

3faiths Had a nice write-up in the Toledo Blade on an inter-faith program I sponsored last Wednesday night, so I'm re-posting it here.  Next week we have a program at the cathedral on prayer, and on May 30 we have a program at the Islamic Center on acts of kindness/charity.  Reb Barry

Clergy of three faiths find common ground
Christian, Muslim, Jewish leaders join in holy-books forum

 From the Toledo Blade , May 12, 2007

BLADE RELIGION EDITOR (David Yonke)

"They're not just books."

The Torah, the Bible, and the Qur'an were written by man but inspired by God, and are "instruction manuals for life," according to religious leaders from the local Jewish, Christian, and Muslim faiths in a public forum Wednesday night.

Rabbi Barry Leff, the Rev. Michael Billian, and Imam Farooq Abo-Elzahab spoke for 20 minutes each, followed by questions and answers from the audience, about their particular religion's views on the Scriptures.

Continue reading "Torah, Avodah, Gemilut Chesed" »

March 14, 2007

The Rabbi and The Supreme Court Justice

ScaliaBl_books On Monday night I had a little debate with Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.  I was worried that after the debate, my wife Lauri might decide she can't take me anywhere--it was at a program for the law school she teaches for--but I thought it was fun.

After dinner and a few short remarks, Justice Scalia opened the floor for questions.  Now to understand the discussion, you have to know a little about Justice Scalia.  He's definitely on the right wing of the Supreme Court--he's often described as the "intellectual anchor of the Court's conservative wing."  He's what's called an "originalist:" when determining whether or not something is Constitutional, originalists hold that you should go by what was the original intent when the Constitution was first approved.  This puts him in opposition with the "evolutionists" who maintain that our understanding of the Constitution can evolve over time, as our society's needs evolve--the "Living Constitution" model.  Justice Scalia would respond that if you want to "evolve" the Constitution the only way to do that is through a Constitutional amendment.

Continue reading "The Rabbi and The Supreme Court Justice" »

March 09, 2007

Ki Tisa 5767 - The Power of the Story

Golden_calf For people who witnessed a lot of miracles, like the plagues in Egypt and the parting of the Red Sea, our ancestors did not show a lot of faith.

Not long after the miracles of leaving Egypt, Moses went up on Mount Sinai to receive the 10 Commandments from God. This week’s Torah reading, Ki Tisa, tells us that when Moses was delayed coming down from the mountain the people told Aaron, “…Make us gods, which shall go before us; we have no idea what happened to this Moses guy who brought out us out of Egypt.” 

Aaron told them, “take the golden earrings from your wives, your sons, your daughters, and bring them to me.” So the people brought their gold to Aaron and he took it, and the Torah tells us that he fashioned a molten calf. The people said “These are your gods, O Israel, which brought you up out of the land of Egypt.” And when Aaron saw it, he built an altar before it; and Aaron made a proclamation, and said, “Tomorrow is a feast to the Lord.” And they rose up early on the next day, and offered burnt offerings, and brought peace offerings; and the people sat down to eat and to drink, and rose up to play.

God saw what was going on, and angrily told Moses “Go down; for your people, whom you brought out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves; They have turned aside quickly from the way which I commanded them; they have made them a molten calf, and have worshipped it, and have sacrificed to it, and said, These are your gods, O Israel, which have brought you out of the land of Egypt...”

We read this story, and the people of Israel seem impatient, unfaithful, and in a hurry to turn astray. Aaron, the high priest, seems just as ready to act the role of high priest to a golden calf as he is to serve as high priest to the Lord our God.

But there is another way to tell the story. Drawing on sources in the Talmud and Midrash, the story comes out very differently:

Continue reading "Ki Tisa 5767 - The Power of the Story" »

January 30, 2007

Bo 5767 -- Due Process

Mosesandaaronbeforepharaoh_sm You don’t want to get on God’s bad side.

When God chooses to take action, God acts as jury, judge, and executioner.  Even though the Midrash tells us that when we pass away, the sins that you’ve committed act as your prosecutor, and the mitzvot that you did create angels that come to your defense, there was no such “due process” for the Egyptians.

This week, in parshat Bo, we read the story of the dramatic climax of the ten plagues that God visited upon the Egyptians – including the ultimate, the plague of the death of the first born.

Unlike God, however, people are fallible.  God may always get the right man, but when human police are involved, they sometimes get the wrong man.  In January of 2000, then Governor of Illinois George Ryan imposed a moratorium on the use of the death penalty.

Governor Ryan said “How do you prevent another Anthony Porter -- another innocent man or woman from paying the ultimate penalty for a crime he or she did not commit?" Governor Ryan was referring to a former inmate whose execution was stayed by the Illinois Supreme Court after new evidence emerged clearing him of the capital offense.

Continue reading "Bo 5767 -- Due Process" »

January 01, 2007

Anti-Semitism in America?

The News Blog suggests that Mel Gibson's anti-Semitic rant is one of the top ten stories of 2006:

"Americans like to pretend that racism, and anti-semitism is part of the past. Mel Gibson, despite being the son of one of America's most prominent Holocaust deniers, hid it well over the years. Then he slipped and the mask came off. Hollywood kept it secrets well. Until this year."

I had my own interesting little brush with American anti-Semitism recently.  A few weeks ago, a reporter from the Toledo Blade called me to ask me what I thought, as a leader in the Jewish community about an anti-Semitic expression used by a public official in one of Toledo's suburbs.  Perrysburg Township Trustee Gary Britten suggested that the deputy fire chief should try to "Jew down" a vendor when buying some equipment.

Naturally, I thought that using the word "Jew" in that fashion is utterly inappropriate, especially for a public official in a public meeting.  The Blade ran an article pointing out how clueless said public official is, which you can read here

What makes the story interesting is that this is not where it stops.  I got an email from a member of my flying club that was very irate, saying I had a lot of nerve to suggest someone should apologize for an anti-Semitic remark, when I had done something which he felt I owed the flying club an apology for.  Talk about a non-sequitur!

Then the letters to the editor began to appear (click on the link and scroll down to read them).  One person wrote to say "My head hurts. Now we have a rabbi whining about Gary Britten in Perrysburg being insensitive. Poor baby. Give me a break would you?"  The author, one Jason Craig, concludes "The one who seems clueless is the rabbi. Only a person who is looking for attention and confrontation would consider that remark insensitive. Any clear-thinking intelligent human would be able to acknowledge it as a "figure of speech." Get over yourself."

Wow!  To start with, I was not looking for attention or confrontation.  The Blade called me, I did not call them.  To "Jew someone down" may be a figure of speech; but so is "there's a nigger in the woodshed," and presumably Mr. Britten would know better than to use THAT one in public!

To their credit, the Blade ran an editorial piece, which you can read here emphasizing just why Mr. Britten needs some "sensitivity training."

To combat racism, anti-Semitism, and other ugly forms of prejudice requires that we have a "zero-tolerance" policy for biased and bigoted remarks.  If we are to teach our children to have respect for people of all races and religions, we have to show that we respect people of all races and religions.

It's disappointing to me that you don't have to dig very deep to find anti-Semitism in America.  The battle to end discrimination of all sorts in this country is far from over.

Reb Barry

December 23, 2006

Dennis Prager fan club?

Cluelessness is apparently not limited to media personalities -- it can be found in the US House of Representatives as well.  Dennis Prager started a storm of discussion in the media and the blogosphere with his opinion piece saying it was wrong for freshman Congressman Keith Ellison, the first Muslim to be elected to the House of Representatives, to want to take his oath of office on a Koran.  See my earlier post here.

As reported in the Washington Post, Representative Virgil Goode (R-Va) made the same criticism in a letter he sent to his constituents.  The full text of the letter can be read here

Goode wrote:

I do not subscribe to using the Koran in any way. The Muslim Representative from Minnesota was elected by the voters of that district and if American citizens don't wake up and adopt the Virgil Goode position on immigration there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Koran.

In his letter, Goode demonstrates a great deal of prejudice and ignorance.  Ellison was born in Detroit.  His Congressional district includes all of the city of Minneapolis and some surrounding suburban territory -- clearly not a place where he was elected by a large Muslim polity.  Ellison is someone born in America who was elected by people who were born in America.

Goode also wrote:

I fear that in the next century we will have many more Muslims in the United States if we do not adopt the strict immigration policies that I believe are necessary to preserve the values and beliefs traditional to the United States of America and to prevent our resources from being swamped.

Goode may be right.  Hullabaloo quotes one of the earliest anti-immigration pieces on record in America:

For example, in one of the earliest anti-immigration utterances on record, an Ohio Valley Indian said this to an English missionary:

"We have great reason to believe you intend to drive us away, and settle the country; or else, why do you come to fight in the land that God has given us?"
...
"Why don’t you and the French fight in the old country, and on the sea? Why do you come to fight on our land? This makes everybody believe you want to take the land from us by force, and settle it."

If we follow Goode's advice and adopt strict immigration policies, we will be abandoning the very values and beliefs that Goode seems to so treasure.  Take a look at the Statue of Liberty, Representative Goode, which has inscribed upon it a poem by Emma Lazarus: "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore.  Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I life my lamp beside the golden door!"

In a response, Goode refused to apologize, and said "The voters of each Congressional district select the representative that they choose to represent them."  That may be true, Mr. Goode, but a bigot is an embarassment to the entire country, not just the district that elected him.

December 13, 2006

Rabbinic Conference on Judaism and Human Rights

I just got back from the first ever Rabbinic Conference on Judaism and Human Rights in New York, sponsored by Rabbis for Human Rights.

It was an outstanding conference.  The learning sessions were excellent.

When I get into a discussion of working with Rabbis for Human Rights, some of my more politically conservative colleagues ask “where are the Imams for Human Rights?”

At the conference the formation (totally independently) was announced of BOTH Imams for Human Rights and Evangelicals for Human Rights.  Human rights is more and more being seen by people of faith as an issue that transcends faith traditions, that transcends politics.

The personal courage of some of our speakers was humbling.  I just want to share two examples that really moved me:

Sister Dianna Ortiz, Catholic nun, spoke about her experiences being tortured in Guatemala.  It was clearly very painful for her to discuss the subject at all.  What the Guatemalans did to her is unbelievable and unforgivable, and the fact that the US government was supporting the Guatemalans when they knew such abuses were going on is very hard to take.  She said that if she had vowed to God to speak out on what happened, she probably would have tried to find a way around the vow, a way to avoid speaking.  But she felt since she had vowed to the other victims – victims who died, whose screams haunted her as she was being tortured herself – she felt she had no way out of that vow, hence her passionate speaking out for all victims of torture.  And she pointed out it’s not a partisan issue; yes, she was called a liar among other things, despite one hundred and eleven 2nd degree burns from cigarettes on her body, by officials in the administration of George H.W. Bush.  However, the Clinton administration was not particularly more responsive in doing anything about what happened or launching an investigation.

And for those who have asked about where are the Muslims worried about human rights, we heard from Bassem Eid, of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group.  Mr. Eid, a Muslim resident of Jericho, speaks out continually about the human rights abuses happening in Palestinian territories – and what he speaks about are the abuses done by Palestinians.  He said terrorism is the ultimate human rights violation. While he doesn’t like the security barrier, he says the Palestinians bear a lot of responsibility for it because they tolerate terrorists.  He acknowledges Israel has a right to defend its citizens.

He is not an Israel loving Christian like Joseph Farah.  Bassem Eid is very aware of human rights violations perpetrated by the Israeli forces operating in the West Bank and Gaza; however he feels as a human rights activist, he needs to focus on the problems in Palestinian society, while Jewish groups can focus on the problems in Israeli society.

His work is described on their web site:  “In effect, the PHRMG has dedicated much of its work to the monitoring of human rights violations committed by the Palestinian Authority. The PHRMG has instituted a number of projects to deal with the ongoing human rights violations. The projects include monitoring unit, freedom of expression and democracy center, settlers watch hotline and legal unit, etc… Our future projects in the coming two years include peace building development, peace building and conflict resolution monitoring, reforms to the Palestinian judicial system, democracy center, public education and out reach unit, etc…

“The PHRMG believes that in spite of the ongoing Israeli occupation of the Palestinian Territories and the need to denounce Israeli human rights abuses, such scrutiny is essential in the current process of state building, to ensure that the future Palestinian State will be a truly democratic one. In the long run, the protection of human rights can only strengthen the Palestinian Authority.”

For a Palestinian still resident in the Palestinian territory to speak out against the Fatah, Hamas, and other Palestinian organizations is clearly an act of great personal courage—the people he speaks out against do not play with kid gloves, as demonstrated by Hamas’ killing three children of a Fatah official earlier in the week.

During the conference we heard the bad news that the Dari home in the Issawiya neighborhood of Jerusalem had been torn down again.  Ahmed Dari and his family live in the Issawiya neighborhood of Jerusalem.  In an effort to limit the non-Jewish population in and around Jerusalem, the municipal government issues very few building permits to Arabs, even when they live in Arab neighborhoods in East Jerusalem.  When in frustration Arabs build homes anyway, the government comes and demolishes them – even though they do not do the same thing to homes illegally built by Jews.  The Dari home was torn down in 2003, despite efforts to save it (click here to read more).  The home was rebuilt with funds and help from Rabbis for Human Rights.  This week the house was torn down again.  Once again, Mr. Dari’s daughter came home from school to find that the place where her home had been in the morning was now a pile of rubble.  Imagine how your child would feel.  On the spot, $30,000 was raised to rebuild the home, should the Dari’s be willing to go through it again—though they may not be.  The outpouring of support was very encouraging.

Moshe Halbertal spoke about the danger when a political battle becomes a religious war: the relative becomes absolutized.  If a particular piece of land is fought over as a matter of religion not politics, it becomes an absolute value and compromise becomes impossible. He suggested we need to do the opposite – to relativize the absolute if we want to be able to find peace in the Middle East.

There were discussions and debates about whether the human rights agenda should be broader and include issues such as social justice or war in general; I take a somewhat narrow view myself (let's stick with fighting torture, and other examples of governmental abuse of power) but it's a healthy debate nonetheless.

I’m sure all 200 attendees came away from the conference revitalized in their dedication to fight for the protection of the vulnerable, regardless of faith, race, or gender.  God willing the conference will happen again next year, I can’t recommend it highly enough.  Kol hakavod to those who worked so hard to make it happen.

Reb Barry

December 06, 2006

Conservative Movement Votes to Ordain Gays and Lesbians

In an eagerly awaited and hotly contested ruling, the Conservative movement’s Committee on Jewish Law and Standards today voted to allow the ordination of gays and lesbians as clergy and sanctioning recognizing their committed relationships, while not endorsing sanctification as marriage.

I’ve appended the official press release below. It may seem a little confusing: reflecting the pluralistic nature of our movement, conflicting opinions were approved by the Law Committee. One says saying it is OK to ordain gays and lesbians, and two say we should maintain the status quo. Individual rabbis are free to follow whichever they prefer in regards to whether they will personally perform a commitment ceremony for gays or lesbians. The movement’s seminaries are free to choose which opinion to follow, so it is not AUTOMATIC that the seminaries will now start admitting openly gay rabbinical or cantorial students. The seminaries now will have their own internal processes to decide what to do. My expectation is that the Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies at the University of Judaism in Los Angeles (my alma mater) will probably fairly quickly move to accept gay and lesbian students, and that the Jewish Theological Seminary in New York will eventually follow suit, although I expect it will be a slower process for them. Machon Schechter, the seminary in Israel, will NOT be ordaining gays and lesbians any time soon as this halachic decision has not been accepted by the Rabbinical Assembly in Israel.

As this is a very important decision for the Conservative movement that will be getting a lot of press in the next few days, I will be speaking about it in a discussion-style format from the pulpit this Shabbat. For those interested in a more in-depth discussion, I will be speaking about the topic and the implications for the movement in greater detail at a S.O.A.P. meeting in January.

I fully support the decision to ordain gay clergy; at the same time I think it is appropriate that this has been a slow and difficult process for the movement, as this does represent a major change in our understanding of halacha (Jewish law) which should only happen after a great deal of debate and discussion.

Click on the post continuation to read the text of the press release.

Reb Barry

Continue reading "Conservative Movement Votes to Ordain Gays and Lesbians" »

December 01, 2006

I swear...but by what book?

Koran Cyberspace is abuzz with a brouhaha initiated by Dennis Prager's bigoted rant against Congressman-elect Keith Ellison of Minnesota, the first Muslim to be elected to Congress.  Prager is outraged that Ellison plans to take his oath of office on a Koran:

Forgive me, but America should not give a hoot what Keith Ellison's favorite book is. Insofar as a member of Congress taking an oath to serve America and uphold its values is concerned, America is interested in only one book, the Bible. If you are incapable of taking an oath on that book, don't serve in Congress. In your personal life, we will fight for your right to prefer any other book. We will even fight for your right to publish cartoons mocking our Bible. But, Mr. Ellison, America, not you, decides on what book its public servants take their oath.

Prager is wrong on so many levels I hardly know where to start.  First of all, he is wrong on the Constitution.  As pointed out by Religion Clause, it would be unconstitutional to insist that everyone be sworn in on the Christian Bible:

UCLA Constitutional Law Professor Eugene Volokh responded at National Review Online, saying that Prager "mistakes the purpose of the oath, and misunderstands the Constitution". He continued, "If Congress were indeed to take the view that 'If you are incapable of taking an oath on that book [the Bible], don't serve in Congress,' it would be imposing an unconstitutional religious test.... Letting Christians swear the oath of office, while allowing members of other denominations only to swear what ends up being a mockery of an oath -- a religious ceremony appealing to a religious belief system that they do not share -- would be [religious] discrimination."

Not only that, but his facts are wrong.  There are Presidents who did not take an oath on the Bible, and there are Jews who have taken the oath on the Torah, as reported by Minnesota Monitor:

In our country's history, four presidents have been inaugurated without swearing an oath on the Bible.  Franklin Pierce was affirmed, and swore no oath, Rutherford Hayes initially had a private ceremony with no Bible before his public ceremony, Theodore Roosevelt had no Bible at his ceremony, and Lyndon Johnson used a missal during his first term.

Despite Prager's insistence that "for all of American history, Jews elected to public office have taken their oath on the Bible, even though they do not believe in the New Testament," it is clear that he is wrong.  Linda Lingle, Governor of Hawaii, took the oath of office on a Torah in 2001.  Madeleine Kunin, a Jewish Immigrant and Governor of Vermont rested her left hand on a stack of old prayer books that had belonged to her mother, grandparents, and great grandfather" as "a physical expression of the weight of Jewish history."

And no, I don't know what book Joe Lieberman used.

The other bloggers miss the religious angle.  If I were to be elected to office, there is no way I would ever take an oath of office on a Christian Bible.  That would be a mockery of my faith, and disrespectful to the Christians.  When we take an oath with our hand on a sacred book, we are swearing by that which is most sacred to us.  Since I don't believe in the New Testament, what kind of oath would it be for me to swear by it?  It would be utterly meaningless.  On the other hand, if I were to swear on a Hebrew Bible, on the Torah, THAT would be a real oath.

In fact, not only would I "allow" Mr. Ellison to take his oath on the Koran, I would insist on it.  If he were to take his oath on a Christian Bible, I might be afraid he wasn't sincere, it wasn't really an oath.  But if he were to swear by the Koran--well then I would know that it was a real oath to him.

Reb Barry

November 08, 2006

Gay Pride in Jerusalem

Jslem_open_house There is a "Gay Pride" march scheduled for Jerusalem this Friday.  It's the most controversial issue to hit the Holy City in quite some time.

For the last week, charedi ("ultra-Orthodox") protestors have been blocking streets, setting fires, and threatening to harm the marchers.  A few days ago Jerusalem's mayor, himself a charedi Jew, had rocks thrown at him by some of his fellow charedim because he was allowing the parade to go on.  The headline for the article describing the incident in Yediot Achronot read "protest, certainly; violence, God forbid!"

I am pleased that the mayor, Uri Lupolianski, has not yielded to pressure from within his own community to cancel the parade.  The organizers of the parade are being sensitive to the religious community.  It will not be taking a route through religious neighborhoods.  The marchers will not be "strutting their stuff" in a provocative fashion in Mea Shearim.

The charedi need to learn the lesson of religious tolerance.  As the mayor said, it is fine to protest; what's not fine is violence.  There have been posters in the religious neighborhoods offering a 20,000 shekel reward to anyone who kills a gay or lesbian marching in the parade.  I don't know what Torah those guys are studying, but not that's not something that would be condoned by any Torah or Talmud that I've learned.

Congregation Beth Simchat Torah in New York has opened a Jerusalem Open House emergency fund to accept donations to defray the costs of security.  You can contribute by clicking here

The blog One Jerusalem correctly points out that "Incidents such as this only indicate that some serious problems still exist concerning democracy and human rights in the State of Israel. "  Yet he then says maybe the parade shouldn't be held in Jerusalem.  That attitude is akin to blaming a woman in mini-skirt if she gets raped.  It's not acceptable.  The hallmark of a free and democratic society is the ability to publicly present your point of view.  The price of living in a democratic society is that people you disagree with are allowed to present THEIR points of view.  If the charedi don't like "Gay Pride" parades, they could try moving to Saudi Arabia where they would not be subject to such scandalous displays.

The following statement has been circulated by Yedidya, Shira Hadasha, Yakar, and a few other of the more enlightened Orthodox communities.  I believe it very appropriately sets out an appropriate response from people in the religious community.

“And they shall answer and say ‘Our hands have not shed this blood.’”

We, members of religious communities in Jerusalem, wish to absolutely disassociate ourselves from words that have been heard in recent days with regard to the “Gay Pride” march that is supposed to take place next Friday in Jerusalem. These words have included incitement toward and understanding of violence, attempts to quash freedom of expression, and contempt for other people.

As citizens of Jerusalem, and as people who see ourselves as an inseparable part of its religious community, we are unable to keep silent when we hear threats of serious violence, especially in light of the fact that similar threats were actualized at last year’s parade. We are conscious of the fact that the campaign of incitement against the march is being described as having the supported of all segments of the city’s religious community, and it is essential to make clear that many, many from this community are in fact disgusted by it. We particularly regret that some of the representatives of the religious educational system, in which our children study, have taken part in this incitement.

This declaration does not constitute support for the march itself, or expression of any position at all regarding its appropriateness or correctness. Among us there are many divergent opinions on the subject, and we respect the right of all sides to express them. But along with this, the seriousness of the words which have been said in recent days obligates all leaders of the community to distance themselves from any hint of incitement or understanding for violence. This affair proves how short the distance is between stifling freedom of expression for those whose beliefs and opinions disagree with our own, and serious violence. The connection of extremist elements and lawbreakers with respected religious leaders, whose ways we usually agree with, nonetheless obligates them to open their eyes and return them to behaving like the “pure ones of Jerusalem.” Lip service will not be enough to prevent violence, and if the expected threats materialize (without protest), the more responsible members of the community will also not have clean hands.

October 27, 2006

Noah 5767 -- "The earth became corrupt"

Noahs_ark Parshat Noach is a very popular part of the Bible with kids.  It’s a simple story kids can understand.  Noah saves two of every kind of animal from a great flood.  The ark and the animals make for great artistic opportunities.  I’m sure most parents have pictures their kids drew of the ark, or of a rainbow or of the animals walking two by two.

In that playful spirit, a little later this morning our kids will sing a song for us about Noah … “the Lord said to Noah, there’s gonna be a floody floody, the Lord said to Noah, there’s gonna be a floody floody…”

With the connection to animals some synagogues offer a blessing for the animals this weekend.  Creative people have made this week’s parsha a lot of fun.

Which is totally incongruous and inconsistent with the actual story.

The truth is, this week’s parsha is the scariest story in the entire Bible.  We should read it and tremble instead of reading it and smiling.  There are a wealth of important lessons we can learn from this truly terrifying tale of death and destruction.

At the end of last week’s Torah reading, Bereshit, we read “And God saw כִּי רַבָּה רָעַת הָאָדָם בָּאָרֶץ  that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the day.  And the Lord repented that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. And the Lord said,  אֶמְחֶה אֶת-הָאָדָם אֲשֶׁר-בָּרָאתִי I will erase man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the birds of the air; for I repent that I have made them.”

In this week’s reading we are told that not only were people and animals wicked, but   וַתִּשָּׁחֵת הָאָרֶץ the earth itself was corrupt, וַתִּמָּלֵא הָאָרֶץ חָמָס and the earth itself was filled with violence.

“And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; כִּי-הִשְׁחִית כָּל-בָּשָר אֶת-דַּרְכּוֹ עַל-הָאָרֶץ for all flesh had corrupted its way upon the earth.  And God said to Noah, The end of all flesh has come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.  And, behold, I, Myself, bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, where there is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.”

And of course it rains for forty days and nights.  “And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.”  The highest mountains were under 23 feet of water.  And then we are told    וַיִּמַח אֶת-כָּל-הַיְקוּם אֲשֶׁר עַל-פְּנֵי הָאֲדָמָה “And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the bird of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth; and Noah only remained alive, and those who were with him in the ark.”

This isn’t just a bad person being punished for his sins, like Cain being punished for killing Abel.  This isn’t just a town or two being destroyed, like Sodom and Gomorrah.  This isn’t even all humankind being punished like happened to us after Adam and Eve’s sin with the illicit fruit.  In the story of the flood, even the animals were punished.

The rabbis tell us that the destruction included not only the animals, but all the plants, and even extending into the air itself – 15 cubits above the ground, and into the very earth itself, three tefachim, about a foot into the ground.

This is story of absolute complete and utter destruction, with just a small remnant saved with which to start over – it’s the stuff of science fiction stories about the end of the world after a nuclear war followed by a nuclear winter with a handful of hardy survivors creating civilization anew.

All of which raises some very obvious questions.  Why should all of the animals have been destroyed?  Why the plants?  Why the air and the earth?  They don’t have free will.  They didn’t “choose” to do anything evil.  OK, man was wicked, destroy man.  Why punish things that didn’t choose to do wrong?  After all, as Avraham Avinu argued with God, ha shofat cal ha’aretz lo ya’aseh mishpat, will not the judge of all the earth act righteously?  Where’s the justice in killing animals and destroying inanimate objects?

Rashi’s commentary on the verse which says “ki hishchit cal basar,” for all flesh had become corrupted says that even the animals were behaving strangely, engaging in the sexual improprieties of interspecies mating, which I guess in the eyes of the rabbis is as close as an animal can get to committing adultery.

Whether or not interspecies mating is a sin of some sort which should cause animals to be liable to the death penalty, we can certainly note that according to this interpretation the animals were acting very strangely indeed.

The late Slonimer Rebbe, not necessarily known as a big environmentalist, teaches that the complete destruction was brought about because of man, who corrupted the environment.  That it was because of man’s sins that the entire environment had become corrupted – the actions of man influence the nature of people, and not only people, but the nature of animals and the nature of all creation.  The Slominer says the flaws of mankind were so terrible in the generation of the flood that they poisoned every part of creation.  The Slonimer teaches that it’s like bacteria or a virus.  You have some kinds of bacteria that might infect a person but are not dangerous to other people or animals in the area – which I suppose would be something like a bacterial infection that someone picked up in a hospital during an operation, it’s not contagious, but it can be very dangerous to the person carrying it around.  Then you have forms of bacteria or viruses that are only dangerous though very close contact with someone, not the Slonimer’s example, but HIV comes to mind.  It’s infectious, but it’s not contagious from just being in the same space.  And then you have bacteria or viruses that render the very air poisonous and dangerous to anyone in the same room, and some kinds of diseases are even contagious across species lines, as bird flu that can jump to humans.

People had become so corrupt and wicked, they polluted the spiritual environment of the world like a deadly virus that spreads with a sneeze or a cough.  The corruption of people was so bad that it spread throughout the environment – to the point that even creations that don’t have a yetzer hara, a wicked inclination, became corrupted.  Even the air and ground itself were rendered poisonous by the sins of mankind.  So God had no choice but to push the “reset button,” to erase what he had created and start over.

The Slonimer says the destruction of the flood was NOT a punishment; rather the world could no longer exist because of all these sins of corruption; when even the air and ground have been corrupted, in essence destruction follows as the only way to restore things to their original purity.

The same thing happens with our computers … some files can become so corrupt, whether through a virus or malfunction, that they can mess up your system so badly that the only solution is to reformat your hard drive and start over – which destroys any data on your disk.  I had a little software problem on my computer last week, and when I called tech support and they offered to help me restore my computer to its original state, I decided I could live with the flaw instead!

God wasn’t punishing the corrupt generation.  He was just pushing the reset button, because there was nothing else to do with it. 

What terrifies me so much about the story of Noah, is that what the generation of the flood did to the spiritual environment, our generation is doing to the physical environment.  With possibly the same ultimate consequences – the destruction of the world we live in.

Rashi’s comment on “all flesh had become corrupted” – that the animals were acting very strangely – reminds me of an article by Charles Siebert that ran in the NY Times magazine a few weeks ago.  “An Elephant Crack-Up: Are We Driving Elephants Crazy.”  Up until recently, people and elephants seemed to get along pretty well.  For the most part we did our thing, they did their thing.   Elephants never attacked humans unless the humans did the attacking first.  An elephant that attacked a human was a “rogue,” was behaving in a very unusual fashion.

But nowadays, elephants are acting up.  Siebert reports that “all across Africa, India and parts of Southeast Asia, from within and around whatever patches and corridors of their habitat remain, elephants have been striking out, destroying villages and crops, attacking and killing human beings.”  The attacks have become so common that there is a new statistical category monitored by elephant researchers knows as “Human-Elephant Conflict,” or H.E.C.  In just the Indian state of Jharkand 300 people were killed by elephants between 2000 and 2004.

What has happened?  We can find a hint in the teachings of the Ba’al HaAkeda, a 15th century Spanish commentator.  Ba’al HaAkedah points out that God told Adam that he would rule over the animals; Noah instead is told that the animals will be afraid of him.  Noah was afraid of bringing dangerous animals onto the ark; God reassured him, and said to him, don’t be afraid – those animals will be afraid of you, you won’t be afraid of them.  The wild animals will flee from you to distant forests.

And what we’re doing today to the wild animals is destroying the distant forests.  They would normally flee from people.  But we’ve been destroying their habitat, and in the case of elephants we’ve been destroying their families through mis-guided herd culling practices.  They have nowhere they can flee from us, and we’ve upset and destroyed their strong family social system.  We are driving the elephants crazy.  The behavior the elephants exhibit is similar to people who are suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome.

Elephants have become corrupted – behaving strangely, attacking humans – and it’s because of the sins of mankind, the sin of destroying the elephants’ habitat and families.

And of course our sins against the environment literally render the air and the ground poison.  The most dramatic example of course being Chernobyl.  Estimates of the death toll from Chernobyl vary widely – they range from a low of 50 to a high of hundreds of thousands of premature deaths.  The truth as in so many things is probably in the middle somewhere. 

The impact we are having on the environment is perhaps nowhere more widespread than what we are doing to the climate.  As is well known, the Bush administration downplays the threat from global warming.  However, the the EPA's web site – a government agency headed by a Bush appointee – tells us that scientists know with virtual certainty that human activity has increased the concentration of greenhouse gases which warm the planet, and that the planetwide average temperature rose somewhere between .7 and 1.5 degrees Centigrade in the 20th century.  The EPA’s web site quotes an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change which says "There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities."

The Arctic is the world’s “canary in the coal mine” when it comes to tracking the effects of global warming and what’s happening in the Arctic is frightening.  Houses in Fairbanks, Alaska are splitting apart as the permafrost they are built on melts due to warming temperatures.  Villages on Alaskan islands are being forced to relocate as ice melts and homes sink toward the sea.  Nearly every major glacier in the world is shrinking; those in Glacier National Park are retreating so quickly it has been estimated that they will vanish entirely by 2030.  Should the warming continue it could lead to the melting of the Greenland ice sheet, with disastrous consequences for every coastal city in the world.

The impact that people have in adding greenhouse gases to the atmosphere is illustrated beautifully in an article by Dr. Jeremy Benstein, Eli and Fagie’s son, which appeared in the Jerusalem Report of October 16.  It’s a lesson we can learn from seeing what happens to air pollution in Israel on Yom Kippur.

Yom Kippur in Israel is very different than Yom Kippur in America.  As Jeremy points out in his article, what happens inside an American synagogue may be similar to what happens inside an Israeli one, but what happens outside is very different.  By popular choice, Yom Kippur in Israel is a “car-free day.”  It is eerie.  The year we lived in Israel I was astounded how on Yom Kippur there was not a single car on the streets, no taxis, no buses, nothing.  The streets are taken over by kids on roller skates and bicycles.  It’s amazing.

It’s not only fun for kids, but it gives the environment a day off too.  In his article, there is a graph which shows the levels of nitrous oxide pollutants in the air in the Tel Aviv area, before, during, and after Yom Kippur last year.  It’s very dramatic.  High levels of pollutants before and after Yom Kippur; on Yom Kippur itself the readings are a fraction of a percent of the day before or the day after.

Just think – if we could get the whole world to really observe Shabbat – a day a week like Yom Kippur in Israel, a day when pollution levels would fall to next to nothing – we could really give the earth a chance to restore itself, at least a little.  The Slonimer rebbe teaches that Shabbat is the remedy to the ills of the generation of the flood.  The Zohar teaches that Noah is an allusion to the Holy Sabbath; the Zohar teaches that Shabbat Kodesh is a day of noach, a day of rest and contentment below and day of noach above.  For every bad or wicked thing in the world there is a good or positive thing in the world to counteract it.  Shabbat is the source of good with no evil.  This explains a teaching from the Talmud which says that anyone who observes Shabbat according to its rules, even if he does idol worship as bad as the generation of the flood, his sins are forgiven him.  This is a hopeful message – if we let the planet rest, perhaps our sins of corrupting the earth can be healed and forgiven.  The pushing of the “reset button” does not need to be inevitable. 

It is, alas, unlikely that we will succeed in getting the whole world to observe Shabbat every week to give the planet a break.  So what can we do?

We can each contribute our part – and observing Shabbat actually does help.  If you cut back cut back on your driving by 1/7 it would mean 15% less air pollution.  We can drive cars that get better gas mileage—the more gas you burn, the more pollution you put in the air.  Hybrid cars, which run on both gas and electric motors, are way better for the environment than regular cars.

The leading greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide.  We can reduce our “carbon footprint” in another way besides driving less.  Planting trees helps because trees breathe in carbon dioxide and breath out oxygen.  British Airways now offers people the option of paying a small additional charge as a donation toward carbon offsets through planting trees so that there would be no net negative impact to the environment from a flight a person takes.   If you donate money to the Jewish National Fund you can do an environmentally correct act expressed in a Zionist way.

You can support organizations dedicated to protecting the environment, like the Sierra Club. Or do it with a Zionist twist and support organizations like the Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life, the Heschel Center or the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel.

A handout with information on organizations that support animals and the environment can be found on the literature table by the entrance.

May God help our generation to learn the lesson of the generation of the flood.  May God help us to stop corrupting the planet before we wipe ourselves out and the planet starts over without us,

Amen.

September 29, 2006

A shameful day for America

Yesterday the Senate approved a bill which gives the President the power to decide which methods of torture are OK to use, and which denies detainees one of the most fundamental rights of all in our legal system, the right to habeas corpus.  CNN's coverage is here.

I have spoken in the past about there is no denying that the "harsh interrogation techniques" the Bush Administration uses are torture, and such treatment is contrary to both secular law and Jewish law.  See my sermon from last year on the subject by clicking here.

Habeas corpus may seem a little obscure to people who don't remember the concept from their high school civics classes.  Basically, habeas corpus says that if you have been imprisoned you have a right to petition a court to review whether you are being held legally.  Without habeas corpus, you can be kept in jail indefinitely, until the people holding you decide they want to bring you to court.  Habeas corpus was codified into law in England in the 17th century, although it had been used for a few centuries before that.  It was seen as very important step to limit the power of the king to arbitrarily lock people up and throw away the key.  And here we are handing our "king," George II, the power to do just that.

It outrages me that the Bush Administration has decided they can totally ignore the rules of the Geneva Convention by inventing a new category, "illegal combatants."  Declare someone an "illegal combatant" the Administration says, and you don't have to follow Geneva Convention "niceties" like not torturing them, or allowing them to communicate with their families.

The lack of will power among our politicians on this issue is appalling.  As reported by Polimom, quoting Glenn Greenwald reports Arlen Specter gave a great speech about what's wrong with the bill:

"During the debate on his amendment, Arlen Specter said that the bill sends us back 900 years because it denies habeas corpus rights and allows the President to detain people indefinitely. He also said the bill violates core Constitutional protections. Then he voted for it."

Maher Arar's case provides a shameful example of what can happen when habeas corpus is ignored.  Despite being a Canadian citizen, when his plane landed in New York he was denied access to a lawyer and was shipped to Syria, where he was tortured for ten months before finally being released.

Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, begins Sunday night. On Monday we will read the words of Isaiah who said "Is such the fast that I have chosen? A day for a man to afflict his soul? Is it to bow down his head as a bulrush, and to spread sackcloth and ashes under him? Will you call this a fast, and an acceptable day to the Lord?  Is not this rather the fast that I have chosen? to loose the chains of wickedness, to undo the bands of the yoke, and to let the oppressed go free, and to break every yoke?"  By passing this bill, Congrss has given much power to the chains of wickedness.

Our politicians are afraid of appearing "soft on terrorism."  Maybe some of them could realize that opposing this bill, and the horrible things it represents, is not being soft on terrorism.  It's being firm on the rights and principles upon which America was founded. 

I've spent way too much time writing this when I've still got preparations for Yom Kippur to complete.  But this is too important an issue to be silent about.

G'mar chatimah tovah (may you be sealed for a good year),

Reb Barry

August 28, 2006

IDF Code of Ethics

Rabbi20drawing I am embarrassed by how clueless some of my rabbinical colleagues are.  I sometimes really wonder whether some of these rabbis study the same Torah and Talmud that I do.

The Jerusalem Post reported on August 21 that the Rabbinical Council of America (RCA) an association of Orthodox rabbis, has called on Israel to reevaluate its military rules of war in light of Hizbullah's "unconscionable use of civilians, hospitals, ambulances, mosques and the like as human shields, cannon fodder and weapons of asymmetric warfare."

Rabbi Basil Herring, executive Vice-President of the RCA said "Our traditional sensibilities tell us that it is not right to risk the lives of our soldiers to minimize civilian deaths on the other side."  Huh?  Is he kidding?  As the blogger Romach points out it is absurb to say such a thing.  Romach says "Surely Herring isn't saying we should just carpet bomb Lebanon or Gaza, killing tens of thousands to save the life of one soldier. Or maybe he is."As I reported a few weeks ago in Matot-Masei and the War in Lebanon we should be proud of those Israeli rules of war known as "Tohar Haneshek," purity of arms.  The basic principle of Tohar Haneshek says “The IDF servicemen and women will use their weapons and force only for the purpose of their mission, only to the necessary extent and will maintain their humanity even during combat. IDF soldiers will not use their weapons and force to harm human beings who are not combatants or prisoners of war, and will do all in their power to avoid causing harm to their lives, bodies, dignity and property.”

In the J Post article Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu of Safed says of our code "Our corrupt military morality, which tells us that our soldiers must endanger their lives to protect enemy civilians, is the reason we lost the war."  Another Orthodox rabbi from the North, Rabbi Tzefania Drori of Kiryat Shmona says "Anti-Semites demand that we use Christian morality while our enemies act like barbarians."

As if this gratuitous and mysterious reference to "Christian morality" isn't bad enough, he went on and said we should follow "Jewish morality," which dictates that "he who gets up to kill you, get up yourself and kill him first."

Yes, Jewish morality does allow for a pre-emptive strike.  But preventing civilian deaths is not "Christian morality," or if it is they got it from us.  Maybe Rabbi Drori was sleeping the day that they studied the section of the Talmud (Bavli Sanhedrin 57a) which says that if you kill someone who is coming after you when you could have stopped him with lesser force, like maiming a limb, you have committed a capital offense.  Perhaps he never studied the passages from Rambam's Hilchot Melachim which tell us we must avoid civilian deaths by leaving them an "escape route."  Perhaps he wasn't paying attention to the teachings about bal taschit, a passage in the Torah which tells us we must not destroy fruit trees to make siege engines in a time of war -- a passage which later authorities (like Maimonides) extend to forbidding any kind of gratuitous destruction of property.

The existing IDF Code of Tohar Haneshek is something every Jew should be proud of.  Yes, it is very painful when some of our soldiers die because we decide to try and minimize civilian deaths by sending in ground troops instead of dropping bombs.  I know it's painful, the son of an acquaintance was killed in Jenin exactly because of this commitment to our code of morality.  However, the prophet Isaiah charges us with being a "light to the nations."  We are supposed to show the world what is moral.  We are supposed to show the world how God wants us to behave.  Just because there are Islamic radicals who cut the heads off of innocent people they kidnap does not mean we should do the same thing.

War is ugly.  The other guys don't fight fair.  That's no reason to throw OUR values, OUR morals, and the principles we have learned from the Torah out the window.  When the other side acts badly is exactly the time when we need a code of ethics all the more, to remind us not to allow ourselves to become as debased as the other side.  We are here to raise the bar, not lower it.

God spare us from "rabbis" who say it is a liability that we have been acting "too ethically."

Reb Barry

August 08, 2006

Teachings on Peace

Blade_interfaith_serviceTeachings on Peace, and Prayer for Peace
By Rabbi Dr. Barry Leff
Congregation B’nai Israel

(photo from Toledo Blade)

On August 7 there was an interfaith prayer service for peace held at Christ the King church in Toledo.  Bishop Blair of the Catholic Diocese of Toledo was the host of the event; various Toledo religious leaders participated, including myself and Imam Farooq Aboelzehab of the Islamic Center.  You can read the article about the event in the Toledo Blade.  It was wonderful to see so many people from so many faiths come together to pray for peace.  The gathering was not about "dialog."  This was not the time to discuss who was right and who was wrong.  It was just a time to come together and pray that whoever is right, whoever is wrong, the violence should come to an end soon and there should be peace.  My remarks--Jewish teachings on peace, and Rebbe Nachman's prayer for peace -- follow.

The world is in great need of healing – fighting and violence rages, not only in the Holy Land, but in Iraq, Sudan, and other places as well.  All over the world people are persecuted for their beliefs, their ethnicity, or their affiliations.

God does not want us fighting with one another.  The rabbi Arbarbanel explains the verse in Deuteronomy which tells us to "walk in God's ways" (Deuteronomy 28:9), as meaning God does not desire death or the destruction of the world but repentance. God extends God's right hand to welcome the penitent, and that includes mortal kings and other people.

God’s wish, God’s blessing, is peace.  The Talmud (Megilah 18a) says the blessing of the Holy One, blessed be He, is peace, as it says, The Lord shall bless his people with peace.

In Leviticus 26:6 God promises וְנָתַתִּי שָׁלוֹם בָּאָרֶץ וּשְׁכַבְתֶּם וְאֵין מַחֲרִיד
And I will give peace in the land, and you shall lie down, and none shall make you afraid;

Too many people all over the world are afraid to lie down for fear bombs will fall on their heads.

Peace means not just peace within our own homes or within our own faith communities, but peace amongst ALL peoples.  In Deuteronomy God commands us “Love you therefore the stranger; for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.”

We have all had the experience of being “strangers.”  Jews, Christians, Muslims, Hindus, have all had times and places where they were persecuted for who they were.

This can only happen when we forget that we are all brothers.  The Talmud teaches that Man was created alone – from Adam – so that no one can say to his fellow “my father was greater than yours.”  We all share the same father.  Recent scientific studies have shown that you only have to go back a few thousand years to find a common ancestor for all mankind – we truly are all related to each other, we truly are all cousins.

Peace is more than something God wants – it is the essence of God Himself.  The Zohar, the central text of Kabbalah, Jewish mysticism, teaches “God is also called “peace”; He is peace, His name is peace, and all is bound together in peace. “

Psalm 50:2 says “Out of Zion the perfection of beauty, God shines forth.”  The Zohar explains God’s shining forth as the light which, when once it shines, will shine for all the worlds. When that light will awaken, the whole will be one common fellowship, under the reign of universal love and universal peace. There will be peace in heaven and peace on earth. So Scripture says: “Peace be within your walls, and prosperity within your palaces (Psalm, 122:7).”

We cannot sit and passively wait for peace to happen; in Psalm 34 we are charged, “bikash shalom v’rodfahu,” Seek peace and pursue it.

Arbabanel tell us that it is preferable to seek peace diplomatically than militarily—he tells us “Have we not seen the many fall to the few or the strong to the weak?...Therefore it is appropriate to choose true peace rather than to trust in a doubtful victory.”

The Talmud tells us we should never give up on the search for peace.  There is a proverb which says “A man should pray for peace even to the last clod of earth [thrown upon his grave].”

Wars are generally started by people who are arrogant.  The Talmud warns “the sin of arrogance is equivalent to all [the others] whereas of the humble it is written, But the humble shall inherit the land, and delight themselves in the abundance of peace (Psalm 39:11)”

We can arrogantly insist that we are only seeking justice.  But the Talmud points to a tension between justice and peace.  The Talmud brings the verse “Execute the judgment of truth and peace in your gates.”  The Talmud points out, surely where there is strict justice there is no peace, and where there is peace, there is no strict justice! But what is that kind of justice with which peace abides? The one which is arrived at through negotiation and compromise.

Psalm 122 tells us:
   שַׁאֲלוּ שְׁלוֹם יְרוּשָׁלָם
6. Pray for the peace of Jerusalem; those who love you shall prosper.
7. Peace be within your walls, and prosperity within your palaces.
8. For my brothers and companions sakes, I will now say, Peace be within you.
9. Because of the house of the Lord our God I will seek your good.

Please join me in prayer, as I recite Rebbe Nachman's Prayer for Peace
(Attributed to Rabbi Nachman ben Feiga of Breslov, 1773-1810)

Adon HaShalom, Lord of Peace, Divine Ruler, to whom peace belongs! Master of Peace, Boray HaKol, Creator of all things!

Yehi ratzon--May it be your will to put an end to war and bloodshed on earth, and to spread a great and wonderful peace over the whole world, so that nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.

Help us and save us all, and let us cling tightly to the virtue of peace. Let there be a truly great peace between every person and their fellow, and between husband and wife, and let there be no discord between people even in their hearts.

Let us never shame any person on earth, great or small. May it be granted to us to fulfill Your Commandment, “vi’ahavta larayacha k’mocha,” to "Love your neighbor as yourself," with all our hearts and souls and bodies and possessions.

And let it come to pass in our time as it is written, "And I will give peace in the land, and you shall lie down and none shall make you afraid. I will drive the wild beasts from the land, and neither shall the sword go through your land. “

God who is peace, barcheinu b’shalom, bless us with peace !!!
Amen.

August 02, 2006

Tisha b'Av in the 21st Century

Tisha b’Av—the ninth of the month of Av—is not one of the most widely observed holidays in the “progressive” movements of Judaism.  Many modern Jews don’t connect with the disasters the holiday commemorates—the destruction of the First and Second Temples, the fall of Betar (signifying the end of the Bar Kochba rebellion in 135CE), the expulsion from Spain in 1492.  The centerpiece of Tisha b’Av observance is certainly mourning for the loss of the Temple.  Which can make it a difficult commemoration since many Jews feel at least ambivalence, if not outright opposition, about the idea of the restoration of the Temple if it also means the restoration of animal sacrifice.  Many Orthodox Jews don't understand the ambivalence many more liberal Jews feel about the Temple;  a blogger, Bec, wrote "please, please tell me that all of conservative judaism doesn't believe that there's no need for the templeplease, please tell me that all of conservative judaism doesn't believe that there's no need for the temple."  This Conservative rabbi at least does pray for the restoration of the Temple--my vision of what that time of the restored Temple woud look like can be read here.

The annual cycle of Jewish holidays is designed to cover the range of human emotions—joyous, sad, reflective, commemorative, and so on.  Tisha b’Av is the time for mourning.  However, I believe that for Tisha b’Av to accomplish its purpose, it needs to be more than a time for commemorating disasters that have befallen our people.  It needs to be a time to inspire us to do something to prevent more disasters from occurring. 

Kabbalah teaches that the Messiah will not come until we have done “tikkun olam,” healing or repair of the world.  Velveteen Rabbit brings a nice teaching about Tisha b'Av and the "four worlds" model of Kabbalah, suggesting that the on the level of atzilut, emanation, Tisha b'Av represents our distance from God; I would say instead perhaps that Tisha b'Av represents not the brokeness in our relationship with the infinite, but rather the brokeness in our relationship with the part of the infinite that consists of our fellow man.

There’s a teaching that says the Messiah won’t come until three days after he’s no longer needed.  According to this view of the Messianic age, the Messiah doesn’t come to make everything perfect—instead, the Messiah’s arrival is sort of a “graduation ceremony,” an acknowledgement that we created the kind of world into which the Messiah could come.

If we are observing the holiday of Tisha b’Av, it means we have failed.  It means that once more, we have not done the work to create the kind of world into which the Messiah could come.  The Temple has not been rebuilt.  There is still strife and senseless hatred in the world.  I fast on Tisha b’Av not so much in mourning for the destruction of 2,000 years ago, but to remind myself that we have not accomplished our work of making the world a better place.  Given the realities of the “neighborhood” Israel lives in, the Temple will not be rebuilt until our Arab cousins decide to invite us to do so—and today we seem further away than ever from such an eventuality.

Israel is at war in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip.  Kassam rockets regularly land in Sderot and Ashkelon, and dozens of Katyushas a day are landing in Haifa, Tiberias, Nehariya, Nazareth, and other cities in the northern part of Israel.  The current situation is a grim reminder of how far we have to go in creating that world of peace, the world symbolized by Jerusalem and the Temple restored.

Technorati Tags:

July 10, 2006